ABSTRACT
To evaluate the accuracy of heparin binding protein (HBP) in the diagnosis of adult sepsis by meta-analysis. Methods The retrospective, randomized controlled and prospective researches on the diagnosis of adult sepsis using HBP were reviewed by searching VIP network, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang database, PubMed, Embase and Web of Science from foundation to August 2018. The researches were selected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, and QUADAS was used to evaluate the quality of eligible studies. Metadisc 14.0 was used to analyze the threshold effect, pool the estimation and do Meta regression analysis. Publication bias was assessed using Stata 12.0 with Deeks funnel plot. Results A total of 728 related literatures were searched and 14 studies were enrolled in this study with a total of 2 023 subjects, with 1 120 in sepsis group and 903 in non-sepsis control group (795 patients with non-sepsis and 108 healthy volunteers). The total score of literature quality was 14-23, indicating that the overall quality was good. Meta-analysis showed that Spearman correlation coefficient between sensitivity logorithm and 1－specificity logorithm of 14 groups of data was 0.106 (P = 0.719), indicating no threshold effect. The pooled sensitivity was 0.74 [95% confidence interval (95%CI) was 0.72-0.77], the pooled specificity was 0.73 (95%CI was 0.70-0.76), the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 14.15 (95%CI was 7.77-25.78), and the area under summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.865. Deeks funnel plot was asymmetrical on the left and right (P = 0.60), indicating that there was no publication bias of the eligible studies. Conclusion HBP has good accuracy for the diagnosis of adult sepsis and it can be used as an auxiliary index for adult sepsis diagnosis.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To evaluate the accuracy of heparin binding protein (HBP) in the diagnosis of adult sepsis by meta-analysis.@*Methods@#The retrospective, randomized controlled and prospective researches on the diagnosis of adult sepsis using HBP were reviewed by searching VIP network, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang database, PubMed, Embase and Web of Science from foundation to August 2018. The researches were selected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, and QUADAS was used to evaluate the quality of eligible studies. Metadisc 14.0 was used to analyze the threshold effect, pool the estimation and do Meta regression analysis. Publication bias was assessed using Stata 12.0 with Deeks funnel plot.@*Results@#A total of 728 related literatures were searched and 14 studies were enrolled in this study with a total of 2 023 subjects, with 1 120 in sepsis group and 903 in non-sepsis control group (795 patients with non-sepsis and 108 healthy volunteers). The total score of literature quality was 14-23, indicating that the overall quality was good. Meta-analysis showed that Spearman correlation coefficient between sensitivity logorithm and 1-specificity logorithm of 14 groups of data was 0.106 (P = 0.719), indicating no threshold effect. The pooled sensitivity was 0.74 [95% confidence interval (95%CI) was 0.72-0.77], the pooled specificity was 0.73 (95%CI was 0.70-0.76), the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 14.15 (95%CI was 7.77-25.78), and the area under summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.865. Deeks funnel plot was asymmetrical on the left and right (P = 0.60), indicating that there was no publication bias of the eligible studies.@*Conclusion@#HBP has good accuracy for the diagnosis of adult sepsis and it can be used as an auxiliary index for adult sepsis diagnosis.
ABSTRACT
Objective To verify the performance of Hitachi 7600 automatic biochemical analyzer .Methods According to labora‐tory accreditation criteria and the performance verification documents of American CLIA′88 ,the precision ,accuracy ,reference inter‐val ,linear range and clinical reportable range were verified for the tests of 19 conventional biochemical indicators performed on Hita‐chi 7600 biochemical analyzer most often .Results The precision ,accuracy ,reference interval ,linear range and clinical reportable range were all acceptable .Conclusion Hitachi 7600 automatic biochemical analyzer could fully meet the reqirements in clinical ap‐plication .
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the application of “top-down” method in assessment of measurement uncertainty of bio-chemical detection indicators .Methods The assessment data of internal quality control and external quality and “top-down”method were used to assess the precision and accuracy of 26 biochemical indicators ,and the two variables above were combined to calculate the measurement uncertainty .Results Uncertainty of 18 biochemical indicators was compatible with the target uncertainty ,ac-counting for approximately 69 .2% of all assessment projects .Five indicators ,such as TBIL ,albumin ,CK ,calcium and magnesium , was not compatible with the target uncertainty ,accounting for approximately 19 .2% of all assessment projects .Conclusion The“top-down” method is effective and feasible for assessment of measurement uncertainty of biochemical detection indicators .